Appeal Successful Cases

May 2007,Mr. Singh Came to Global as his student visa had been cancelled 6 months ago;

as he did not notify school with his new address, he did not received the Section 20 warning letter;

Global obtanied a bridge visa for him, before submit to DIAC to get his student visa back;

3 months, later, his student visa had been obtained,

30 March 2010, Carrick Institute certify him not meet academic requirement.

15 April 2010 Mr. Singh received a section 20 letter, to notify him to intend to cancel his student visa under section 137J.

19 April 2010, our immigration lawyer, Mr, Rhys Strang write to DIAC to explain special circumstance, despite DIAC insist
there is ground to cancel his student visa, however Case Officer in DIAC finally took Rhys’s advice not to cancel his student
visa. Mr. Singh obtained PR via Global, and now operate his own restaurant.

Mr. Singh’s student visa had been cancelled in 2007, but he was not aware, He still stay in Australia didn’t go to school but work everyday.

14 October 2008 our migration agent Ms Grace Shen write to DIAC to revoke his student visa. in our submission, DIAC believed that
Mr, Singh in fact did not breach the condition 8202 of his student visa.

He has since completed his course, and we had applied for his PR in 2011.

            1 May 2008 He had been granted a student visa to come Australia for study translating and interpreting.

4 August 2010 His school issued him a section 20 letter, to warn that his student visa will be cancelled within 28 days. Our immigration lawyer, Mr. Rhys Strang represent his case in front of DIAC. DIAC took our lawyer’s opinion that, his school (APEI) did not follow legislative procedure to allow him access appeal before issue the final student visa cancellation notice.

DIAC decided not to cancel his student visa.

              She enrolled in SIIT, after 2 weeks, she realized that she is not suitable to study this course;

She talk to college to change school, SIIT refused; School said she can leave after 6 months;

She lost interest to continue in this course, she absent a lot;

SIIT sent her Section 20 letter, without any warning.

Global complaint to DIAC, her visa was not cancelled, also Global change college for her during the process.

She now is very happy studying Accounting course in Curtin Sydney.

16 Nov 2010 She received a section 20 letter from SIBT, to notify her academic performance failed to meet student visa requirement, (condition 8202, over 50% of her subjects failed in first 2 semesters).in fact, all 8 subjects she study in SIBT for first 2 semesters, she only passed 1 subject.

Our immigration lawyer, Mr Rhys Strang represent her case in DIAC explanation process.

DIAC finally decided not to cancel her student visa within 28 days.  She has since graduated from Macquarie University after 2.5 years.

            on May 2011, She had argue with school teacher, been kicked out of class a few times after that;

Since then, all her subjects failed by the school AIT.

College ask her to pay all tuition fee, before can release her to another college; she refused to pay;

College report her to DIAC to cancel her student visa, based on poor performance;

Global took on her case within 28 days, submit to DIAC by Migration Agent Grace SHEN
5 working days later,DIAC decided not to cancel her student visa.

Now she is a student, who persuant her career dream as a film director.

Ms. Jingjing study bachelor of Commerce the third year in UTS, In 2013 She received a warning letter to notify the exclusion of 1 year from      UTS due to her poor academic performance in UTS. This means she cannot graduate on time and also she will have to graduate from less famous university in Australia, not UTS, the one she loved and work hard for 2.5 years.

our immigration lawyer write to UTS, win the appeal on her behalf.

she had been graduated from UTS, and obtained PR through Global. Currently, She works as an accountant in Australia.

On 29 June 2007, Mr. SUVO received section 20 letter from his education provider , which school complaint that his attendance was 58% during term 2 of his study.

On 1 Oct 2007, Mr. SUVO came to see us.

On 2 Oct 2007, we lodged application for restate his student visa,

On 8 Oct 2007, we obtian student visa for this client.

       Mr Pan received notification of exclusion from his course: Bachelor of Business, on the date of 16/12/2013.

       Mr Pan began his study on 04/02/2013, but due to his poor academic performance (he studied for 2 semesters, and failed 3
subjects out of 4 in each semester); consequently, UTS sent him the exclusion letter and warned to report to Immigration to
cancel his student visa, from which he thought he had little chance to turn the situation.

       On 23/01/2014, our immigration lawyer Mr Rhys Strang wrote to UTS, acting for Mr Pan’s internal appeal with detailed and
flawless explanation.  UTS finally accepted the reason that Rhys put forward and Mr Pan is now able to continue his bachelor
study again and able to fulfil his migration dream upon completion.