as he did not notify school with his new address, he did not received the Section 20 warning letter;
Global obtanied a bridge visa for him, before submit to DIAC to get his student visa back;
3 months, later, his student visa had been obtained,
30 March 2010, Carrick Institute certify him not meet academic requirement.
15 April 2010 Mr. Singh received a section 20 letter, to notify him to intend to cancel his student visa under section 137J.
19 April 2010, our immigration lawyer, Mr, Rhys Strang write to DIAC to explain special circumstance, despite DIAC insist
there is ground to cancel his student visa, however Case Officer in DIAC finally took Rhys’s advice not to cancel his student
visa. Mr. Singh obtained PR via Global, and now operate his own restaurant.
14 October 2008 our migration agent Ms Grace Shen write to DIAC to revoke his student visa. in our submission, DIAC believed that
Mr, Singh in fact did not breach the condition 8202 of his student visa.
He has since completed his course, and we had applied for his PR in 2011.
DIAC decided not to cancel his student visa.
She talk to college to change school, SIIT refused; School said she can leave after 6 months;
She lost interest to continue in this course, she absent a lot;
SIIT sent her Section 20 letter, without any warning.
Global complaint to DIAC, her visa was not cancelled, also Global change college for her during the process.
She now is very happy studying Accounting course in Curtin Sydney.
Our immigration lawyer, Mr Rhys Strang represent her case in DIAC explanation process.
DIAC finally decided not to cancel her student visa within 28 days. She has since graduated from Macquarie University after 2.5 years.
Since then, all her subjects failed by the school AIT.
College ask her to pay all tuition fee, before can release her to another college; she refused to pay;
College report her to DIAC to cancel her student visa, based on poor performance;
Global took on her case within 28 days, submit to DIAC by Migration Agent Grace SHEN
5 working days later,DIAC decided not to cancel her student visa.
Now she is a student, who persuant her career dream as a film director.
our immigration lawyer write to UTS, win the appeal on her behalf.
she had been graduated from UTS, and obtained PR through Global. Currently, She works as an accountant in Australia.
On 1 Oct 2007, Mr. SUVO came to see us.
On 2 Oct 2007, we lodged application for restate his student visa,
On 8 Oct 2007, we obtian student visa for this client.
subjects out of 4 in each semester); consequently, UTS sent him the exclusion letter and warned to report to Immigration to
cancel his student visa, from which he thought he had little chance to turn the situation.
flawless explanation. UTS finally accepted the reason that Rhys put forward and Mr Pan is now able to continue his bachelor
study again and able to fulfil his migration dream upon completion.
13 December 2012 Mr. Wang received a section 20 letter, intend to cancel his student visa due to his academic performance in ANU.
Our immigration lawyer Mr. Rhys Strang act on his behalf to response to DIAC on 28 December 2012.
DIAC point out that there is ground to cancel his visa, however the evidence provided by Mr. Rhys Strang, has convinced
him, that Mr. Wang was effected by exceptional circumstance behind his control.
Therefore, DIAC decided not to cancel his student visa on 28 Feb 2013.
Immigration Department side finally decided not to cancel her student visa on 16/05/2013 and in this way Ms Yip is able to continue her study in Melbourne University.